|
| CONTACT: | Marc Littman,
Metro Media Relations, (213) 922-4609 Metro Media Relations @ (213) 922-2700 |
|
Statement
Regarding Metro Board Decision January 9, 2002 The Board unanimously
approved a proposal by Los Angeles Mayor Jim Hahn to direct the Metro to
come back in 60 days with an action plan, to present to the Special Master,
on how the Metro will further implement the Consent Decree. In addition, after serious
thought and debate, the Metro Board of Directors has voted to appeal to
the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify how to measure compliance with the Consent
Decree and what role the federal courts can play in solving transportation
problems. The Metro reaffirms its
commitment to the Consent Decree and will continue to fulfill its obligations
under that agreement reached in 1996.
We are not seeking to dissolve the agreement, but instead have
plans underway to move forward with Metro Bus improvements.
As new buses arrive almost daily, we’re proposing a massive expansion
of the popular Metro Rapid Bus program, construction of new busways, and
decentralizing service to give communities more local control, among other
improvements. But as it is currently
interpreted, the Consent Decree has become a roadblock that threatens
our ability to provide meaningful solutions to traffic problems, and chokes
off transportation improvements for all of the residents of Los Angeles
County, including bus riders. Several weeks ago the
Board postponed its decision on this issue and directed the Metro to reach
a reasonable solution to this dispute.
However, over the past eight weeks of meetings in which our CEO
has been personally involved, the plaintiffs have refused to respond to
our repeated attempts to settle the dispute. The Metro Board feels it
is a misuse of taxpayer money for the courts to order the Metro to keep
adding buses on lines where there’s already plenty of service scheduled,
at the expense of areas that are underserved by buses, or which could
be better served by other transit tools. Against this backdrop,
the Metro Board felt it had no choice but to exercise its duty to represent
the transportation interests of all Los Angeles County residents and appeal.
Return to Pressroom | Click here to return to metro.net Home
|
|