Viewpoint Masthead Image MTA Press Releases
CONTACT:  Marc Littman, Metro Media Relations, (213) 922-4609
Metro Media Relations @ (213) 922-2700

 

Statement Regarding Metro Board Decision
 to Appeal Consent Decree


January 9, 2002

The Board unanimously approved a proposal by Los Angeles Mayor Jim Hahn to direct the Metro to come back in 60 days with an action plan, to present to the Special Master, on how the Metro will further implement the Consent Decree.

In addition, after serious thought and debate, the Metro Board of Directors has voted to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify how to measure compliance with the Consent Decree and what role the federal courts can play in solving transportation problems.

The Metro reaffirms its commitment to the Consent Decree and will continue to fulfill its obligations under that agreement reached in 1996.  We are not seeking to dissolve the agreement, but instead have plans underway to move forward with Metro Bus improvements.  As new buses arrive almost daily, we’re proposing a massive expansion of the popular Metro Rapid Bus program, construction of new busways, and decentralizing service to give communities more local control, among other improvements.

But as it is currently interpreted, the Consent Decree has become a roadblock that threatens our ability to provide meaningful solutions to traffic problems, and chokes off transportation improvements for all of the residents of Los Angeles County, including bus riders.

Several weeks ago the Board postponed its decision on this issue and directed the Metro to reach a reasonable solution to this dispute.  However, over the past eight weeks of meetings in which our CEO has been personally involved, the plaintiffs have refused to respond to our repeated attempts to settle the dispute.

The Metro Board feels it is a misuse of taxpayer money for the courts to order the Metro to keep adding buses on lines where there’s already plenty of service scheduled, at the expense of areas that are underserved by buses, or which could be better served by other transit tools.

Against this backdrop, the Metro Board felt it had no choice but to exercise its duty to represent the transportation interests of all Los Angeles County residents and appeal.

 

Return to Pressroom | Click here to return to metro.net Home